Posted on: November 27, 2015 Posted by: Michele Lee Comments: 0

“Pertussis, also known as whooping cough, is a highly contagious respiratory disease. It is caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Pertussis is known for uncontrollable, violent coughing which often makes it hard to breathe. After fits of many coughs, someone with pertussis often needs to take deep breaths which result in a “whooping” sound. Pertussis can affect people of all ages, but can be very serious, even deadly, for babies less than a year old. The best way to protect against pertussis is immunization.” — Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

“The truth,” as they used to say on “The X-Files,” “is out there.” Trouble is, few people know where to look for it. And thanks to the corporate propaganda media, it is often concealed beneath mounds of argle-bargle and outright sophistry.

Take, for instance, a September New York Times article about pertussis. “Pertussis Passed to Newborns From Siblings,” the headline reads. The article touts a new study published in the journal Pediatrics that found that the primary source of pertussis infection in infants is their older siblings — siblings who had received the DTaP vaccine.

But the article covers up some key facts. It’s the fourth paragraph before we read this nugget:

The finding is probably a result of waning immunity among children and adolescents who had received the DTaP vaccine. Since the disease can spread from vaccinated siblings, “cocooning” — making sure that everyone in contact with the baby is vaccinated — is unlikely to reduce the spread among infants too young to be vaccinated.

But wait! Vaccine pushers ensure us that the great thing about vaccines is the “herd” immunity produced. Herd immunity is, as Vaccines.gov tells us, “When a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak.”

The schedule for the DTaP vaccine, which also “protects” against tetanus and diphtheria, calls for a vaccine administered to infants starting at 2 months old and then four more shots periodically through ages 4 to 6. The implication of the article is that perhaps more booster shots are needed.

What The Times failed to mention is that the Food and Drug Administration has found that, “When you’re newly vaccinated you are an asymptomatic carrier, which is good for you, but not for the population.” The FDA also knows that baboons vaccinated against pertussis continue to carry the disease in their throats and spread it. But do doctors or the CDC tell parents their infant is more in danger when exposed to newly vaccinated children? Hardly!

That is the opposite of herd immunity.

Additionally, CDC data show that, just like viruses and bacteria are becoming antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” due to the over-prescription of antibiotics, pertussis has morphed into a bacterium that not only resists the new vaccination, but actually prefers vaccinated hosts.

As I have told you many times, vaccines destroy natural immunity. Scientific research shows this is particularly true with pertussis. And in fact, far from creating immunity, pertussis vaccines are enabling the spread of the disease; hence the growing rate of pertussis cases in America, despite an aggressive vaccine regimen.

The question is: Why doesn’t mainstream medicine give this news to parents? The answer is money.

H/T: Jeremy R. Hammond

Source link







Leave a Reply